Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41909513›Full record

ArticleReview of general psychology : journal of Division 1, of the American Psychological Association2025

An Inclusive History of LGBTQ+ Aversion Therapy: Past Harms and Future Address in a UK Context.

Kate Davison, Katherine Hubbard, Sarah Marks, Hel Spandler, Rebecca Wynter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Review of general psychology : journal of Division 1, of the American Psychological Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kate DavisonUniversity of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Katherine HubbardUniversity of Surrey, Guildford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1990-7449
Sarah MarksBirkbeck, University of London, London, UK.
Hel SpandlerUniversity of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.
Rebecca WynterUniversity of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1692-6089

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

From the 1950s, aversion therapy gained an international foothold as a behaviourist means to alter what was then considered 'deviant' behaviour. Using primary research by psychologists, psychiatrists and other clinical figures published in professional journals, recently published personal testimonies by those who underwent such 'treatment', and drawing on the latest historical research, this article maps aversion therapy practices used to 'treat' LGBTQ+ people in the UK, mainly in the 1960s and 1970s. We outline our approach to this history and contextualise it by drawing attention to ongoing comparative issues of banning LGBT conversion therapy in the present. Next, we outline the emergence of aversion therapy internationally and identify historical 'hotspot' hospitals and universities in the UK, with the nation itself an international 'hotspot' for aversion. We then employ the case study of the 2022 report from the University of Birmingham, to demonstrate how such investigations of difficult pasts might be most effectively realised and highlight the potential for a 'truth and reconciliation' approach to this history. Finally, we call upon psy-organisations, university and research institutions, and other stakeholders to take this history seriously in effort to address past and ongoing harms enacted upon LGBTQ+ people.

Indexed as

aversion therapyconversion therapyLGBTQ+ historyLGBTQ+ psychologypathologisationtruth and reconciliation

Identifiers

PMID41909513
PMCPMC13021076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.