ReviewFrontiers in global women's health2026
Obstetric violence from the perspective of healthcare personnel: a qualitative systematic review.
Review in Frontiers in global women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: While empirical research on obstetric violence has focused primarily on women's experiences, the perspectives of healthcare personnel remain relatively neglected. Consequently, this study synthesized qualitative evidence regarding healthcare professionals' perceptions of obstetric violence to understand how their views are constructed and which contextual factors influence the reproduction of these practices. Methodology: A qualitative systematic review was conducted, covering literature published between 2019 and 2025. The search encompassed the ProQuest Central, Sage Journals, Web of Science, Scopus, SciELO, and PubMed databases. Following PRISMA guidelines, 22 studies that met the inclusion criteria and addressed the research question were included. The data were analyzed using a hermeneutic approach oriented toward recovering the meanings attributed to obstetric violence within its specific production contexts. Results: The reviewed studies reveal tension between recognizing and denying obstetric violence among professionals. Some discourses justify institutionalized practices under biomedical logic, while others express discomfort and internal contradictions toward actions perceived as violent yet considered part of the clinical routine. Medical hierarchy, professional training, work overload, and lack of awareness of reproductive rights were identified as factors shaping these perceptions. Differences were also observed between disciplines (e.g., midwifery vs. obstetrics) and levels of experience (e.g., professionals vs. students). Discussion: Findings suggest that obstetric mistreatment is a systemic and modifiable phenomenon rather than merely a product of individual intent. Empirical intervention literature demonstrates that professional perceptions can be shifted through structured institutional reforms and training. Eradicating obstetric violence requires moving towards a systemic thinking approach that addresses institutional stressors and promotes humanized, woman-centered care models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.