Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41909494›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in global women's health2026

Obstetric violence from the perspective of healthcare personnel: a qualitative systematic review.

Fátima María Guzmán-Guevara, Natalia I Manjarres-Posada, Georgina Vega-Fregoso

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in global women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fátima María Guzmán-GuevaraMaster in Socio-Medical Sciences, Department of Social Sciences, Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, México.
Natalia I Manjarres-PosadaRegional Institute for Public Health Research (IRISP), Department of Public Health, Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, México.
Georgina Vega-FregosoDepartment of Public Health, Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, México.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: While empirical research on obstetric violence has focused primarily on women's experiences, the perspectives of healthcare personnel remain relatively neglected. Consequently, this study synthesized qualitative evidence regarding healthcare professionals' perceptions of obstetric violence to understand how their views are constructed and which contextual factors influence the reproduction of these practices. Methodology: A qualitative systematic review was conducted, covering literature published between 2019 and 2025. The search encompassed the ProQuest Central, Sage Journals, Web of Science, Scopus, SciELO, and PubMed databases. Following PRISMA guidelines, 22 studies that met the inclusion criteria and addressed the research question were included. The data were analyzed using a hermeneutic approach oriented toward recovering the meanings attributed to obstetric violence within its specific production contexts. Results: The reviewed studies reveal tension between recognizing and denying obstetric violence among professionals. Some discourses justify institutionalized practices under biomedical logic, while others express discomfort and internal contradictions toward actions perceived as violent yet considered part of the clinical routine. Medical hierarchy, professional training, work overload, and lack of awareness of reproductive rights were identified as factors shaping these perceptions. Differences were also observed between disciplines (e.g., midwifery vs. obstetrics) and levels of experience (e.g., professionals vs. students). Discussion: Findings suggest that obstetric mistreatment is a systemic and modifiable phenomenon rather than merely a product of individual intent. Empirical intervention literature demonstrates that professional perceptions can be shifted through structured institutional reforms and training. Eradicating obstetric violence requires moving towards a systemic thinking approach that addresses institutional stressors and promotes humanized, woman-centered care models.

Indexed as

health personnelmidwiferyobstetriciansobstetric violenceperceptionqualitative methodssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41909494
PMCPMC13017908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.