ArticleAmerican heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice2026
Investigating the necessity of preoperative coronary angiography for infection-related cardiac implantable electronic device explantation.
Article in American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comment on "Investigating the necessity of preoperative coronary angiography for infection-related cardiac implantable electronic device explantation".American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Device-associated endocarditis is a potentially life-threatening condition that typically requires the removal of the cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED). The role of routine coronary angiography (CAG) as part of preoperative evaluation remains uncertain. Objectives: This study aims to assess the necessity of preoperative CAG and its impact on clinical outcomes in patients who underwent isolated CIED explantation due to infection. Methods: A single-center retrospective analysis was conducted at Jena University Hospital between 2007 and 2023. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. The secondary outcomes were major perioperative complications. The data were displayed using descriptive statistics and classic 2-sided tests. Results: A total of 287 high-risk patients underwent isolated CIED explantation due to infection, of whom 120 underwent a preoperative CAG while 167 did not. Preoperatively, almost the half of the patients did not present history of coronary artery disease (No CAG: 53.9% and CAG: 45.0%), and the CAG group presented higher rates of lead vegetation (65.0% vs 52.7%, Conclusions: The analysis suggests that preoperative CAG does not significantly influence short-term outcomes after CIED explantation due to infection in our patient population. Systematic preoperative CAG may not be necessary for all patients. Moreover, non-invasive imaging modalities may have emerging importance in scenarios like this.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.