ArticleCureus2026
Formative Structured Oral Examination as a Novel Method of Academic Mentoring for Slow and Medium Achievers in Medical Biochemistry: A Mixed-Method Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAcademic mentoring is essential for graduate students who are slow or medium achievers. Yet, the usefulness of the Formative Structured Oral Examination (FSOE) as a tool for academic mentoring has not been studied. This study aims to assess the utility of FSOE as a tool for fostering academic mentoring among slow and medium achievers.
methodsA convergent mixed-method study was conducted among 52 first-year MBBS students, covering three biochemistry topics with residents serving as resource persons. The study included both a quantitative single-group pre-post quasi-experimental component and an exploratory qualitative component (feedback and focus group discussions). Two cycles of FSOE were performed for each topic, with one student at a time and pre-prepared color cards. Each FSOE session lasted approximately one hour. Multiple-choice pre- and post-tests were conducted before and after the FSOE. Feedback was collected from students using a structured questionnaire employing a seven-point Likert scale. The questionnaire was reviewed by subject experts for content validity prior to administration, and focus group discussions were held among students and resource persons. Pre- and post-test scores were compared using a paired t-test for normally distributed variables and a Wilcoxon signed-rank test for non-normally distributed variables. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Analyses were done using IBM SPSS Statistics software, version 20 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
resultsFSOE implementation resulted in a significant improvement in post-test scores. Among low achievers, fat-soluble vitamin scores increased from 11 (8-13) to 17 (14-20) (p = 0.001; r = 0.85), while medium achievers also showed significant gains (p = 0.001; d = 1.21). Low achievers demonstrated significant improvement in amino acid metabolism and DNA replication (p < 0.05), with large effect sizes (d = 1.80 and 1.02). Scores further improved after the second FSOE cycle across all groups (p < 0.001). Compared with a topic taught without the FSOE, normalized pre- to post-test improvement showed large effect sizes across groups. Internal assessment scores improved significantly among low achievers (p < 0.005). Feedback and focus group discussions indicated enhanced conceptual understanding, improved engagement, reduced examination stress, increased motivation, and improvement in resource persons' teaching skills, though logistical and inclusivity concerns were noted among the students.
conclusionsThe FSOE was an effective academic mentoring program that benefited both students and resource persons. The FSOE may be implemented as a regular mentoring program in medical biochemistry to address academic difficulties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.