Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41909434›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Sedentary Lifestyle and Estimated Fracture Risk in the Elderly: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Tommy A Masal, Erica Kholinne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tommy A MasalSurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, IDN.
Erica KholinneSurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, IDN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Fractures are a major public health concern among the elderly and contribute substantially to morbidity and disability. Sedentary behavior has been proposed as a modifiable risk factor for fractures; however, evidence regarding its association with fracture risk remains inconsistent. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between a sedentary lifestyle and fracture risk among elderly individuals in a nursing home setting. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted in October 2025 at Tresna Werdha Budi Mulia 2 Social Home, Jakarta. A total of 93 participants aged ≥60 years were recruited using consecutive sampling. Physical activity levels were assessed using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), and fracture risk was evaluated using the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) without bone mineral density. Fracture risk was categorized as low (<5%) or moderate-to-high (≥5.0-7.5%). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v23, and the Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact test was used to assess the association between physical activity level and fracture risk. Results The study included 93 participants, consisting of 50 males (53.8%) and 43 females (46.2%), aged between 60 and 91 years, with a mean age of 69.7 ± 7.5 years. Most participants were classified as sedentary (n=62, 66.7%) and had a low fracture risk (n= 75, 80.6%). No statistically significant association was found between sedentary lifestyle and fracture risk (p = 0.232). Conclusion A sedentary lifestyle was not significantly associated with fracture risk among elderly nursing home residents. These findings indicate that fracture risk is likely influenced by multiple interacting factors beyond physical activity alone. Further longitudinal studies using objective physical activity measurements are needed to clarify this relationship.

Indexed as

elderlyfracture riskfraxphysical activitysedentary lifestyle

Identifiers

PMID41909434
PMCPMC13032917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.