ArticleCureus2026
Robotic Release of Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome: A Case Series.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Median arcuate ligament syndrome (MALS) is a rare condition caused by compression of the celiac artery by the median arcuate ligament (MAL), resulting in postprandial discomfort and abdominal pain. Surgical decompression remains the definitive treatment. We present a series of three patients with MALS, including a 22-year-old male, a 73-year-old male, and a 46-year-old female, managed with robotic median arcuate ligament release (MALR). All patients underwent diagnostic imaging with computed tomography angiography, demonstrating celiac artery stenosis with a characteristic hook-shaped appearance, as well as celiac artery duplex ultrasound revealing increased flow velocities with expiration. All procedures were performed using a robotic approach. After abdominal access and insufflation, the esophageal hiatus was exposed, the lesser omentum was opened, and the angle of His was dissected. The esophagus was encircled for retraction, allowing clear identification of the right and left crura and exposure of the aorta to the level of the celiac axis. Careful adhesiolysis enabled the complete release of the MAL along with surrounding neural and fibrous tissue. This case series highlights the importance of considering MALS in patients with chronic postprandial abdominal pain and demonstrates the feasibility of the robotic approach in offering enhanced visualization, precision, and dexterity to support the paucity of literature on the effectiveness of robotic MALR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.