ArticleCureus2026
Spinal Cord Stimulation for Refractory Chest Pain Without Objective Ischemia in a Patient With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Refractory nonischemic chest pain in patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and optimal medical therapy presents a significant management dilemma when conventional cardiac evaluations are nondiagnostic. We report a case of a 60-year-old male patient with prior CABG and multiple percutaneous coronary interventions who experienced recurrent admissions for severe chest pain despite angiographically patent grafts and nondiagnostic ischemic evaluations, requiring escalating opioid therapy for symptom control. Under fluoroscopic guidance, percutaneous epidural leads were placed at T6-T7 to target the T2-T4 cardiac dermatomes. During a four-day trial of spinal cord stimulation (SCS), he experienced complete resolution of chest pain, discontinued opioids, and returned to full functional capacity. Permanent implantation was performed without complications. At six-month follow-up, he remained pain-free (0/10), had no further hospital readmissions, and reported marked improvement in quality of life. We propose that SCS may provide analgesia through neuromodulation of dorsal column pathways and partial sympathetic tone modulation of cardiac accelerator fibers, optimizing myocardial oxygen supply-demand balance. This case highlights SCS as a promising analgesic strategy for refractory nonischemic chest pain in anesthesia practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.