Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41909356›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents for Endoscopic Drainage of Intra-abdominal Abscesses: A Systematic Review.

Iñaki Guasque Gil, Nicole Elbjorn Medina, Julianne Villa Trejo, César Villa Jirash

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Iñaki Guasque GilDepartment of General Surgery, Hospital General de Especialidades "Dr. Javier Buenfil Osorio", Campeche, MEX.
Nicole Elbjorn MedinaDepartment of General Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Ciudad de México, MEX.
Julianne Villa TrejoDepartment of General Surgery, Universidad Saint Luke, Ciudad de México, MEX.
César Villa JirashDepartment of General Surgery, Hospital San Ángel Inn, Ciudad de México, MEX.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intra-abdominal abscesses require timely source control, most commonly achieved through image-guided percutaneous drainage. However, percutaneous access may be unfeasible or ineffective in selected cases due to anatomical constraints, interposed organs, or prior drainage failure. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage using lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) has emerged as an alternative minimally invasive strategy, although evidence supporting its use in non-pancreatic intra-abdominal abscesses remains limited and heterogeneous. This systematic review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive search of PubMed/MEDLINE was performed from database inception through January 2024 to evaluate the feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of EUS-guided LAMS for non-pancreatic intra-abdominal abscesses. The primary objective was to translate these findings into a conservative, anatomy-driven approach to support clinical decision-making. A total of 16 studies involving 99 patients were identified, including observational studies, case series, and case reports; studies focusing exclusively on pancreatic fluid collections were excluded. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklists. Primary outcomes included technical and clinical success, while secondary outcomes comprised adverse events and reintervention rates. Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria, consisting predominantly of retrospective series and case reports. Reported technical success ranged from approximately 92.5% to 100%, with clinical success rates between 88% and 100%. Adverse events were infrequent and generally mild, occurring in fewer than 10% of cases; these were predominantly mild, including transient abdominal or rectal discomfort, minor bleeding, and occasional stent migration. Most abscesses were pelvic or postoperative collections, commonly managed via transrectal or transcolonic access routes. Evidence supporting transgastric or transduodenal drainage was limited to carefully selected upper abdominal collections. EUS-guided drainage using LAMS appears to be a feasible and effective option in carefully selected patients with non-pancreatic intra-abdominal abscesses, particularly when percutaneous drainage is unfeasible or has failed. Success depends on strict apposition to the gastrointestinal lumen and adherence to the 'shortest-safe-path' principle, making it a viable rescue strategy after conventional drainage failure. Given the limitations of the available evidence, including small sample sizes and predominantly observational designs, this technique should be applied cautiously, with rigorous patient selection, strict anatomical considerations, and a predefined strategy for stent management and removal.

Indexed as

abscess managementendoscopic drainageendoscopic ultrasoundintra-abdominal abscesslamslumen-apposing metal stentsminimally invasive drainage

Identifiers

PMID41909356
PMCPMC13030992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.