ReviewCureus2026
Perineural Steroid Injections in Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) is a prevalent mononeuropathy, although the role of perineural steroid injections (PSI) remains uncertain. This meta-analysis and systematic review sought to compile and evaluate all available evidence regarding the potential benefits of PSI. The performance of PSI was assessed objectively using ultrasound (US) and nerve conduction studies NCS), and evaluated clinically through patient-reported questionnaires. This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A literature search was performed across PubMed, Embase, and Medline databases. Common outcomes and control groups were categorised together. Meta-analysis was performed where possible, while narrative synthesis was used for studies with substantial heterogeneity. A risk of bias assessment was also undertaken. The search yielded a total of 1751 papers. Nine studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 357 cases of CuTS. Clinically, patients who received PSI performed significantly better on clinical questionnaires and reported improved global symptom ratings. PSI was shown to be a useful adjunct compared with other treatment modalities, such as surgery and splinting. Steroid injections were also shown to be a reliable diagnostic tool in clinically uncertain cases of CuTS. No significant complication profile was identified with PSI. Meta-analysis of pooled results revealed no significant improvement in US findings or NCS. PSI was found to alleviate symptoms and signs of CuTS across a range of clinical tools and questionnaires. It represents a safe therapeutic modality that could serve a valuable adjunctive and diagnostic function. Objective improvement on imaging or electromyographic studies was not observed. Additional longitudinal studies with larger sample sizes are required. There is also a need for further comparisons between different treatment options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.