ArticleCureus2026
Racial Dysmorphisms of the Ear Among the Tanzanian and Indian Populations: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction The human ear exhibits significant morphological and morphometric variations across populations, influencing clinical practices, forensic identification, and psychosocial perceptions. This study aims to compare ear parameters between Tanzanian and Indian populations, assessing racial and sexual dysmorphisms. Methodology A cross-sectional study was conducted from March 2024 to February 2025 in Tanzania and India, involving 240 eligible participants aged 18-35 years (120 per country: 60 men and 60 women). Measurements, including ear length, width, lobule dimensions, concha parameters, and distances from the ear to the eye, mouth, and mandible, were taken using digital Vernier calipers and goniometers. Results Significant racial differences were observed in most ear parameters, with Indian ears generally larger than Tanzanian ears, except for right concha length, right concha width, and left concha width. Sexual dimorphism was more pronounced in the Indian population, with men showing larger parameters than women in most measurements, while Tanzanian men and women exhibited fewer significant differences. The ear's position relative to facial landmarks was significantly larger in the Tanzanian population. Lobule attachment types varied, with pendulous being the most common. Conclusion This study highlights significant differences in ear parameters between Tanzanian and Indian populations for both sexes. These variations are important, particularly in fields such as plastic and reconstructive surgery, prosthetic ear development, and otological treatments, where understanding population-specific anatomical differences is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes. In forensics, ear morphology is a reliable biometric marker for personal identification and aiding in criminal investigations and disaster victim identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.