Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41909273›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in gastrointestinal endoscopy

Patient experiences of colon capsule endoscopy: a qualitative study.

Laura Jefferson, Holly Essex, Karl Atkin, Veronica Dale, Karen Bloor, Monica Haritakis, James Turvill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in gastrointestinal endoscopy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laura JeffersonUniversity of York, York, UK.
Holly EssexUniversity of York, York, UK.
Karl AtkinUniversity of York, York, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1070-8670
Veronica DaleUniversity of York, York, UK.
Karen BloorUniversity of York, York, UK.
Monica HaritakisYork and Scarborough Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, York, UK.
James TurvillYork and Scarborough Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Wigginton Road, York, YO31 8HE, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3068-5015

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) was introduced by NHS England at scale during the COVID-19 pandemic to support colorectal diagnostics recovery. However, little was known about the patient experience of CCE. Objective: To explore the experiences of CCE during the NHS England pilot, to better understand what a patient-centered service for the future should look like. Design: A qualitative study to explore the patient and clinician experiences of CCE. Methods: Focus group discussions ( Results: Most patients valued CCE's convenience and would repeat it, although for some their experiences would deter them from having the procedure again. Anxieties included fear when swallowing the capsule; concerns about it becoming stuck and/or whether the recording was working; what to do when the capsule was inside them; and worries about the novelty of the treatment. Women expressed greater discomfort, pain and anxieties during bowel preparation and the procedure than men. Participants highlighted the need for a more balanced description of the procedure than indicated in information leaflets and videos. They particularly felt the possibility of further investigations could be better explained. Healthcare professionals may underestimate patient concerns. Conclusion: CCE has the potential to expand colorectal diagnostic capacity but requires patients to be well informed and supported throughout the process. Gender differences in experiences of CCE are notable and could be partially addressed by providing more specific information, consistent with women's experiences.

Indexed as

colon capsule endoscopycolorectal cancercolorectal polypsdiagnostic accuracygender differencespatient experiencequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID41909273
PMCPMC13018699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.