Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41909255›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2026

Spatial biogeography of microbes in soils vs. aquatic ecosystems in U.S.'s major natural biomes.

Leo Oo Sai, Xinhao Zhu, David A Lipson, Xiaofeng Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leo Oo SaiBiology Department, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, United States.
Xinhao ZhuBiology Department, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, United States.
David A LipsonBiology Department, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, United States.
Xiaofeng XuBiology Department, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Microbial macroecology has gained recognition as a critical component of microbial ecology. Using data from the National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON), this study examined the spatial patterns of microbial abundance and their environmental controls in soil and aquatic ecosystems across major natural biomes in the United States. Methods: Microbial cell density in aquatic ecosystems and soil microbial biomass carbon in terrestrial ecosystems were analyzed, and their relationships with environmental variables were evaluated using correlation analyses. Results: In aquatic ecosystems, microbial cell density ranged from 1.8 × Discussion: In aquatic systems, cell density increased with specific conductance and water temperature but decreased where dissolved oxygen was high. In terrestrial ecosystems, biomass was higher in soils with greater soil nitrogen content, soil carbon content, and moisture, indicating that nutrient-rich and humid environments favored microbial growth. In contrast, abundances declined in warmer and more alkaline soils. These biogeographic patterns show divergent environmental factors driving microbial abundance in various ecosystems, reflecting high microbial adaptation to surrounding physical and chemical conditions.

Indexed as

biogeographycell densitymicrobial biomasssoilwater

Identifiers

PMID41909255
PMCPMC13018165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.