Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41909219›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2026

LINA's testing infrastructure enables AI to take-off in unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).

Hella A Bolck, Janik Vollenweider, Fabian Merkli, Alexander Barden, Martin Jajcay, Peter Trempeck, Boško Rafailović, Robert Fraefel, Peter M Lenhart, Ricardo Chavarriaga and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Hella A BolckCentre for Artificial Intelligence, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Janik VollenweiderSchool of Business, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, Olten, Switzerland.
Fabian MerkliCentre for Aviation, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Alexander BardenRobotics and Perception Group, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Martin JajcayCentre for Aviation, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Peter TrempeckMatternet Operations GmbH, Dübendorf, Switzerland.
Boško RafailovićSkyguide, Swiss Air Navigation Services Ltd, Geneva, Switzerland.
Robert FraefelSkyguide, Swiss Air Navigation Services Ltd, Geneva, Switzerland.
Peter M LenhartCentre for Aviation, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Ricardo ChavarriagaCentre for Artificial Intelligence, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Manuel RenoldSchool of Business, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, Olten, Switzerland.
Jasmina BogojeskaCentre for Artificial Intelligence, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Thilo StadelmannCentre for Artificial Intelligence, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Michel GuillaumeCentre for Aviation, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of autonomous aerial robots capable of safely navigating complex real-world environments without or with little human intervention represents a major milestone in robotics and artificial intelligence (AI). While rapid advances in AI-enabled decision-making, sensing, and control systems are unlocking new capabilities for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), their translation into safe and scalable real-life applications remains a major challenge. In this Perspective, we examine key AI technologies relevant to aerial autonomy and discuss early application scenarios in unmanned aviation and airspace management, with a focus on their assurance-relevant properties. We analyze regulatory obstacles that limit deployment, particularly for AI-enabled and beyond visual line of sight (BVLOS) operations, and highlight why traditional risk assessment and certification approaches are need to be updated to account for adaptive, data-driven systems. Building on this analysis, we argue that testing infrastructure must be understood as a core scientific instrument, enabling systematic evidence generation under realistic and safety-critical conditions, validating autonomous functions, ensuring safety, and building trust among regulators and the public. As a concrete example, we introduce LINA, a scientifically-grounded, integrated experimentation and validation platform in Switzerland designed to support iterative, regulator-aware development of autonomous systems across technology readiness levels. We highlight how LINA function as sandbox for system-level science, regulatory learning, and trust building, thereby enabling the responsible and societally acceptable integration of autonomous aerial systems and strengthening Switzerland's role in advancing aerial robotics research and innovation.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceautonomous systemsBVLOS operationscertificationsafetytestingunmanned aerial systems

Identifiers

PMID41909219
PMCPMC13022511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.