ArticleACS physical chemistry Au2026
Determination of Nucleotide-Nucleotide and Nucleotide-Amino Acid Binding Interactions from All-Atom Potential-of-Mean-Force Calculations.
Article in ACS physical chemistry Au, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative Assessment of Free Energy Computational Methods for Revealing the Interactions Driving PARP1 Selective Inhibition.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biomolecular condensates emerge from multivalent interactions between proteins and nucleic acids and are frequently modeled by using coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations. The parametrization of these models critically depends on atomistic data describing the underlying molecular interactions. In this work, we employ all-atom molecular dynamics simulations and potential-of-mean-force (PMF) calculations to investigate the landscape of interactions between RNA nucleotides and protein amino acids. We begin by characterizing nucleotide-nucleotide binding modes through canonical base-pairing analysis, observing notable agreement in the predictions from both the AMBER03ws and CHARMM36 force fields. Further rationalization of different nucleotide-nucleotide interaction modes involves the calculation of PMFs for ribose-ribose, phosphate-phosphate, and RNA tertiary interactions such as G-quadruplex formation. We also examine the effect of salt concentration on these interactions, finding a reduction in electrostatic self-repulsion for phosphate-phosphate binding upon increasing the ionic strength. Expanding our analysis to amino acids, we first benchmark the performance of both AMBER03ws and a99SB-disp force fields for describing pairwise amino acid interactions, and then, we evaluate different nucleotide-amino acid binding profiles. Our findings reveal a subset of amino acidsLys and Arg (positively charged), Asp and Glu (negatively charged), and Gln, Ser, and Asn (polar residues)that consistently engage with the nitrogenous bases of different nucleotides. Such binding is primarily mediated by hydrogen bonding and, in some cases, cation-π interactions. Furthermore, we identify strong π-π stacking interactions with aromatic residues and phosphate-Arg contacts as key contributors to condensate cohesion in RNA-protein condensates. Our comprehensive analysis provides a detailed library of nucleotide-amino acid interactions, offering quantitative insights to inform coarse-grained model parametrization and deepening our understanding of condensate self-assembly, nucleic acid recognition, and phase-separation regulation at the submolecular scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.