ArticleClinical case reports2025
Unexpected Coronary Sinus Embolization of a Leadless Pacemaker due to Initial Device Failure: A Case Report.
Article in Clinical case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Unexpected Coronary Sinus Embolization of a Leadless Pacemaker due to Initial Device Failure: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Leadless pacemakers reduce complications compared to transvenous systems, but device dislodgement and embolization can occur. We report an 81-year-old man with atrial fibrillation and bradycardia who underwent Micra implantation. Because of inner shaft damage and insufficient tine fixation, the device embolized into the coronary sinus. It was successfully retrieved using a double-snare technique, and a new device was implanted. This case highlights the importance of meticulous deployment technique and thorough intraprocedural assessment of device attachment, as well as troubleshooting strategies for unexpected embolization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.