ArticleSleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society2026
ACCESS-OSA: a randomized controlled trial for accurate, accessible, and cost-effective screening solutions for obstructive sleep apnoea: study protocol.
Article in Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- New Obstructive Sleep Apnoea Multi-Night Diagnostic Devices. Is a Single Night of Measurement Now Considered Enough?Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
32 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is common and burdensome, yet current diagnostic pathways remain costly and often misclassify patients. Single-night polysomnography (PSG), the diagnostic gold standard, fails to capture night-to-night variability in severity, is difficult to access and costly. Emerging technologies enable multi-night in-home evaluation, but robust comparative evidence regarding accuracy and cost-effectiveness is lacking. This study will evaluate (a) the diagnostic accuracy of three multi-night in-home devices versus conventional single night PSG; (b) the patient and signal characteristics that optimize diagnostic performance; and (c) the cost-effectiveness of these pathways for clinical implementation. We will conduct a three-arm randomized diagnostic strategy trial (n = 500) enrolling adults referred for suspected OSA over a recruitment period of several years from July 2025. All participants will undergo both conventional single-night PSG and multi-night assessment with an under-mattress sensor, oximetry ring, and forehead EEG device. Participants will be randomized to one of three diagnostic pathways, determining the order in which sleep physicians interpret test results. Sleep physicians will provide sequential diagnostic decisions at each stage, and a blinded expert panel will determine consensus diagnoses. The primary outcome is diagnostic accuracy of each pathway compared with consensus diagnosis. Secondary outcomes include cost-effectiveness, patient-reported acceptability, clinical confidence, self-reported long-term symptoms, and health and quality of life outcomes over 12 months follow-up. Findings will provide definitive evidence for whether simplified and accessible multi-night testing can improve accuracy and cost-effectiveness of OSA diagnosis in routine care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.