ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026
Occurrence of viral and bacterial pathogens in South American camelids in representative German flocks.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Antimicrobial susceptibility and virulence traits ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rapidly growing populations of South American camelids (SAC), introduced to Europe as non-indigenous species, have increased contacts at the livestock and human interfaces. This study assessed the occurrence of epizootic and zoonotic viral and bacterial pathogens of prime importance on 10 farms, selected to mirror the diversity of German SAC holdings in size and animal use. Farms were visited four times at approximately 6-months intervals, with 20 animals sampled per visit, resulting in 739 blood and 723 fecal samples from 449 animals (292 alpacas, 156 llamas, one huarizo). Wherever possible, diagnostic methods applied followed national or international recommendations. Antibodies against Schmallenberg virus were detected in 54.6% of animals. Only three animals showed reactivity against Borna disease Virus 1 and one against bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) 1. All animals tested negative for BVDV-2, border disease virus and bovine herpesvirus 1. Thirty-six samples from 30 SAC yielded a non-negative, presumably false-positive results for antibodies against the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.