Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41908953›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026

Ondřej Máca, Roman Vodička, Iva Langrová

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ondřej MácaDepartment of Zoology and Fisheries, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czechia.
Roman VodičkaThe Prague Zoological Garden, Prague, Czechia.
Iva LangrováDepartment of Zoology and Fisheries, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czechia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Studies focusing on the larval stages of Methods: Data from 32 dead animals, including nine common gundis ( Results: In 10 cases, animals (including four gundis, one squirrel, four hutias, and one lemur) were found positive, with infection intensities ranging from a single larval cyst in the liver to two and 10 metacestodes in the pleural and/or peritoneal cavities. Additionally, one beech marten ( Conclusion: Molecular tools were employed for accurate species- and haplotype-level identification through characterization of the cytochrome

Indexed as

Central Europecommon gundiCuban hutiaHimalayan striped squirrelMetacestodesmolecular identityring-tailed lemurzoonotic parasite

Identifiers

PMID41908953
PMCPMC13021405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.