ArticleDental research journal2026
Dentinogenic ghost cell tumor: Two case reports and review of the literature.
Article in Dental research journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dentinogenic ghost cell tumor (DGCT) is a rare odontogenic neoplasm, representing a solid variant of the calcifying odontogenic cyst (COC), accounting for 2%-14% of all COCs and <0.5% of odontogenic tumors. Its unique histological and clinical characteristics, coupled with its potential for local invasiveness, underscore the necessity for accurate diagnosis and management. This article reports two cases of DGCT Case 1involves a 13-year-old boy presented with the absence of permanent teeth 4 and 5. Radiographic examinations revealed a mixed radiolucent-radiopaque lesion in the left mandible associated with the impacted permanent teeth. The lesion exhibited well-defined borders and significant calcifications. Microscopic analysis revealed islands of odontogenic epithelium with features resembling ameloblasts, numerous ghost cells, and areas of dystrophic calcification, confirming the diagnosis of DGCT. Case 2 involves A 67-year-old male presented with an exophytic lesion on the left side of the mandibular alveolar mucosa. On pathologic examination, the sample revealed features that led to the diagnosis of a peripheral DGCT. In the first case, given the lesion's size and location, a surgical excision was performed using an intraoral approach under general anesthesia, including a margin of healthy tissue. Short-term follow-ups were conducted every 3 months, and no recurrence was noted after 6 months. In the second case, an excision biopsy and short-term follow-up were conducted. This case highlights the clinical presentation, radiographic features, and histopathological characteristics of two cases of DGCT, emphasizing the importance of surgical intervention and regular follow-up in managing this rare neoplasm. Enhanced awareness and understanding of DGCT are essential for timely diagnosis and effective treatment, particularly in pediatric patients presenting with dental abnormalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.