ReviewPostepy psychiatrii neurologii2026
Advantages and disadvantages of artificial intelligence in the prediction and prevention of suicide.
Review in Postepy psychiatrii neurologii, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), such as natural language processing (NLP), neural networks (NN), and machine learning (ML), are often used in various fields of science, also to successfully predict acts of suicide. This, however, raises seve-ral ethical and practical concerns. In this study, we explore the moral and technological challenges involved, as well as the potential applications of AI in suicide prevention. Views: According to the literature, AI can be used to assist clinicians in identifying and addressing mental health issues by incorporating data from social media platforms, health records, and conversations with chatbots or between users. This information can be integrated into algorithms to develop solutions. Our analysis of the articles reviewed suggests that, with the vast amount of data put into them, AI systems might be able to predict suicidal tendencies, provide faster diagnoses, and improve healthcare by providing clinicians with an additional tool to help identify patients in need of assistance. However, ethical dilemmas must be addressed, including concerns over the invasion of privacy, the risk of data leaks due to insufficient security, and potential algorithmic biases deriving from the datasets on which these systems are trained. Conclusions: AI algorithms can help prevent and predict suicide by analyzing data from medical records, social media, and clinical databases. However, challenges like securing personal data and avoiding discrimination must be addressed. Proper programming and access control are crucial for ethical use. Despite these issues, AI's advantages and resolvable limitations make it a promising tool in the attempt to reduce suicide rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.