ArticleNature and science of sleep2026
Current Status and Influencing Factors of Insomnia Severity in Adolescents: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Nature and science of sleep, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To investigate the status and influencing factors of insomnia severity among Chinese urban adolescents and to develop a predictive model for early identification. Design: A multi-center cross-sectional study. Methods: A survey was conducted with 4288 secondary school students from Wuhan, China. A nested case-control sampling method was used within the cross-sectional survey to enhance statistical power for predictive modeling. Data were collected using standardized scales including the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), the Three-dimensional Psychological Pain Scale (TDPPS), and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Statistical analyses included univariate analysis, correlation analysis, and multivariable binary logistic regression to identify independent predictors and construct a prediction model. Results: Psychological pain was the strongest risk factor (OR=1.444), followed by depression (OR=1.292) and parental absence >3 months (OR=1.290). Increasing age (OR=0.361) and higher paternal education (OR=0.644) were protective. The final optimized prediction model demonstrated excellent goodness-of-fit (Nagelkerke Conclusion: This study identifies psychological pain as the strongest predictor of adolescent insomnia, exceeding the influence of depression and anxiety. We developed a streamlined 9-variable prediction model with high accuracy (88.6%), offering a practical tool for efficient, large-scale insomnia screening in school settings. This enables early identification and paves the way for targeted, preventive interventions. Implications for Practice: Clinical assessments for adolescent insomnia should incorporate the evaluation of psychological pain. The model enables school nurses and mental health professionals to efficiently identify at-risk adolescents, promoting precision-based preventive care. Impact: This study addresses the multifactorial nature of adolescent insomnia and the lack of practical screening tools. Findings will benefit school health systems and mental health practitioners. Reporting Method: This study was reported in accordance with the STROBE guidelines for cross-sectional studies. Patient or Public Contribution: Patients or the public were not involved in the design, conduct, analysis, interpretation, or preparation of the manuscript for this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.