Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41908861›Full record

ArticleBehavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology

To flee or wait and see? Response of incubating white-browed scrubwrens to information about danger.

You Zhou, Andrew N Radford, Robert D Magrath

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. To flee or wait and see? Response of incubating white-browed scrubwrens to information about danger.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

You ZhouDivision of Ecology and Evolution, Research School of Biology, Australian National University, 46 Sullivans Creek Road, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9758-9378
Andrew N RadfordSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, 24 Tyndall Ave, Bristol BS8 1TQ, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5470-3463
Robert D MagrathDivision of Ecology and Evolution, Research School of Biology, Australian National University, 46 Sullivans Creek Road, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9109-609X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals suffer elevated predation risk during reproduction, with nesting parents having to decide whether to flee from nearby predators for their own safety or to stay and thus avoid betraying the nest's location to protect offspring. Gaining information about the source of danger is therefore crucial. From inside a nest, it might be difficult to gather relevant information visually and so acoustic signals and cues become particularly important. However, there has been little investigation of the response of nesting parents to acoustic information about different predation risks. We used a playback experiment to test how incubating female white-browed scrubwrens,

Identifiers

PMID41908861
PMCPMC13017106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.