ArticleInternational journal of women's health2026
Bridging Knowledge Gaps: Prenatal Education Acquisition and Its Determinants Among Expectant Mothers in Northwestern China.
Article in International journal of women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Factors Influencing Successful Breastfeeding: A Regional Survey and Comparative Review in European and Global Contexts.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: High-risk pregnancies (HRPs) remain a significant global public health issue, notably increasing maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Prenatal education is crucial in mitigating the risks associated with HRPs by providing expectant mothers with essential health information. This study aims to investigate the factors associated with frequent acquisition of prenatal knowledge. Methods: A multicentre cross-sectional study was conducted between March and October 2023 involving 1211 pregnant women from three hospitals in Northwestern China. Data were collected via a self-administered questionnaire. Frequent prenatal knowledge acquisition was defined as seeking information at least three times per week. Both simple and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify determinants. Crude odds ratios (ORs) and adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, and model discrimination was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: Approximately 69.5% of participants reported regularly seeking prenatal information. Healthcare professionals were the most cited information source (64.7%). The multivariate logistic regression model demonstrated good discrimination (AUC = 0.75). Six factors were significantly associated with frequent knowledge acquisition: high-risk pregnancy (AOR=1.49, 95% CI: 1.15-1.94), higher household income (AOR=1.45, 95% CI: 1.06-1.98), shorter distance to healthcare facilities (AOR=2.65, 95% CI: 1.80-3.91 for <30 min), public sector employment (AOR=2.04, 95% CI: 1.40-2.99), attending ≥four antenatal visits (AOR=2.49, 95% CI: 1.27-4.89), and being in a long-distance marriage (AOR=2.21, 95% CI: 1.40-3.51). Conclusion: The acquisition of prenatal knowledge is influenced by high-risk pregnancy status and multiple sociodemographic factors. Priority interventions should target underserved groups, particularly low-income families, women in remote areas, and those with high-risk pregnancies. Health systems should enhance equitable access by combining digital platforms for urban populations with community-based outreach (e.g, mobile clinics, health workers) for marginalized communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.