ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Evaluation of the concordance of asthma remission definitions according to international guidelines in a cohort of patients treated with monoclonal antibodies for severe asthma.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical Remission Trajectories Beyond 12 Months in Severe Asthma Patients Continuing a Single Biologic: A Real-World Single SANI Center Cohort.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The availability of biological therapies has helped achieve clinical remission (CR) in patients with severe asthma (SA). Scientific societies issued different definitions of remission, with the common denominator of the suspension of systemic corticosteroids for at least 1 year. Additional criteria are associated with symptoms, stability of pulmonary function, disease exacerbations, ACT ≥20 or ≥23, and ACQ ≤1.5. We evaluated the agreement among criteria adopted in Italy, Spain, Germany, Japan. Method: An observational prospective, single-center study was carried out: 65 patients with SA treated for 12 or 24 months with omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab or dupilumab were recruited. Data on exacerbations, need of systemic corticosteroids, asthma symptoms, ACT and ACQ, pulmonary function at baseline and 12 and 24 months were collected. Differences of qualitative variables were assessed with the Chi-squared or Fisher's exact test. Cohen's Kappa coefficients were calculated to assess agreement between definitions of remission. The statistical significance threshold was set at Results: 28 (43.1%) patients at 12 months and 27 (47.4%) at 24 months did not meet any criteria for CR, whereas 34 (52.3%) at 12 months and 28 (49.1%) at 24 months met at least one definition of complete CR. The agreement among the selected guidelines was substantial, with an overall Fleiss K of 0.7971 (P < 0.0001). Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps was more prevalent in patients who achieved CR, whereas gastro-esophageal reflux disease was more prevalent in patients who did not. Conclusion: Consistently with other studies only 52.3% at 12 months and 49.1% at 24 months achieved complete CR. The agreement of CR is substantial. The main limitations of the study are its monocentric nature and the poor sample size, whereas its main strengths were the evaluation both at 12 and 24 months and the adoption of four different definitions. Nonetheless, a worldwide definition could enhance the standardization of CR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.