ArticleJournal of research in nursing : JRN2026
Nurses' perceptions of a digital supportive intervention for patients with breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a qualitative study.
Article in Journal of research in nursing : JRN, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Commentary: Evaluating a digital intervention for symptom management in breast cancer care: insights from oncology nurses.Journal of research in nursing : JRN · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Interventions using electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) have proven effective in enhancing patient support and self-care during cancer treatment. Successful implementation depends on nurses' acceptance, as they play an important role in patient care and support. Aim: To describe nurses' perceptions of an interactive digital intervention (Interaktor) to provide support in symptom management for patients with breast cancer during neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Method: This qualitative study involves paired interviews with four purposively sampled nurses involved in a complex digital support intervention at two oncology clinics in Sweden. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results: Two themes reveal that Interaktor can be effectively integrated into clinical practice, highlighting the importance of establishing routines, allocating time, and customising user-friendliness. The nurses were enabled to identify patients' needs for additional support and enhance their ability to involve patients in their care. Potential benefits for other healthcare professionals were recognised. Conclusions: The integration of Interaktor into breast cancer care was accepted by nurses and may offer benefits for patients and healthcare professionals. Using ePROs can help identify patients with an extended need for supportive care. Time constraints, digital skills, and workflow integration are challenges that need to be addressed for future implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.