Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41908778›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Burnout and career satisfaction in neurology.

Kristijonas Puteikis, Rūta Mameniškienė

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kristijonas PuteikisClinic of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Rūta MameniškienėClinic of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Neurology ranks among specialties with the highest burnout rates, yet little is known about neurologists' subjective experiences. We aimed to assess burnout, career satisfaction and associated factors among Lithuanian neurologists, as well as their views on the field's future. Methods: From June 2024 to March 2025, we conducted a cross-sectional anonymous survey of Lithuanian neurologists. The questionnaire assessed career satisfaction, work-rest balance, and perspectives on neurology. Burnout was measured using the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory. Stepwise linear regression identified associated factors. Results: Responses were obtained from 111 neurologists (73.0% female; mean age 53.2 ± 12.8 years; mean practice 26.0 ± 14.0 years). Personal, work-related and patient-related symptoms of burnout were present at least sometimes in 44.1%, 30.6%, and 27.0% of respondents, respectively, and commonly linked to insufficient personal time, inadequate leisure, and poor sleep. Regression analyses ( Conclusion: Despite high career satisfaction and optimism regarding therapeutic progress, symptoms of burnout are prevalent among Lithuanian neurologists, driven by suboptimal work-rest balance and systemic limitations. These findings emphasize the need for organizational and policy measures to support physician wellbeing and strengthen healthcare efficiency.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalJob SatisfactionNeurologistsNeurologyAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLithuaniaMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnairesburnoutdementianeurologistoccupational healthstroke

Identifiers

PMID41908778
PMCPMC13018105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.