ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Decoding stakeholders' demand to map the future of smart communities: evidence from China.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Smart community development is critical for enhancing community resilience and strengthening collective capacities to respond to public health and other urban crises. A model-based taxonomy of stakeholder demands remains absent, as existing exploration has largely been limited to analyses of single stakeholder groups. Method: This study therefore develops a comprehensive classification model to capture stakeholder demands across three critical dimensions: community safety, livability services, and community governance. By integrating hierarchical clustering and K-means analysis of survey data from 1,606 respondents across 32 typical smart communities in China, a clear taxonomy of stakeholder demand emerges. Results and Discussion: The analysis identifies four distinct clusters: Cluster 1 (strong livability services demand), Cluster 2 (prioritized safety and governance demand), Cluster 3 (comprehensive demand across all dimensions), and Cluster 4 (weak livability-focused demand). Furthermore, these clusters reveal a consistent evolutionary pathway along a low-medium-high demand continuum. Conclusion: The findings provide a basis for public health and crisis governance, enabling targeted strategies that address differentiated community demands and foster more resilient communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.