Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41908684›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health research2026

Building healthy beginnings: A qualitative descriptive study of midwives' role in identifying and promoting mentally healthy mothers in Australia.

Lesley Pascuzzi, Karen Heslop, Helen Skouteris, Zoe Bradfield

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lesley PascuzziSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4431-5998
Karen HeslopSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Helen SkouterisHealth and Social Care Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9959-5750
Zoe BradfieldSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Good mental health positively impacts public health by improving maternal and neonatal outcomes. Women benefit from routine care and health promotion provided by midwives. However, there is no documented evidence regarding midwives' perspectives on their public health role in supporting mentally healthy mothers and little is known about midwives' understanding and practices in this area. To address this evidence gap, the aim of this study was to qualitatively explore perspectives of identifying and promoting maternal mental health and wellbeing. Design and methods: A qualitative descriptive approach was used. Data were collected via online 1:1 interviews or a focus group. Data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. Results: Ten midwives participated. Six semi-structured interviews and one focus group of four midwives were conducted. Five themes were generated: The Well Woman; Scope of Practice; Impact of Current Maternity System; Continuity of Care and Perinatal Mental Health Literacy. Conclusions: Findings indicate Australian midwives are well-placed to promote maternal mental health within routine practice but have limited resources. Midwives described promoting mental health as being within their role and scope of practice, reporting barriers including societal views, priorities, and systemic pressures of time and limited access to both publicly funded and private continuity of care models. Our findings suggest midwives in Australia are well-placed but not equipped to promote maternal mental health at present.

Indexed as

maternal mental health promotionmentally healthy mothersmidwives’ scope of practicepublic healthqualitative descriptive study

Identifiers

PMID41908684
PMCPMC13031753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.