ReviewOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2026
Outcomes Following Multiligament Knee Injuries: A Systematic Review of Studies With a Minimum 7-Year Follow-up.
Review in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Multiligament knee injuries (MLKIs) are complex and present significant challenges in achieving optimal long-term outcomes. This systematic review aims to evaluate clinical and functional results, complications, and return-to-sport rates following MLKIs, with a minimum 7-year postoperative follow-up. Purpose: To report the long-term clinical and functional outcomes after MLKIs at a minimum 7-year follow-up. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, identifying 16 studies encompassing 730 knees. Extracted data included patient-reported outcomes, return-to-sport rates, osteoarthritis development, complications, reoperations, and revision procedures. Due to study heterogeneity, a qualitative analysis was conducted. Results: Postoperative patient-reported outcomes demonstrated considerable variability, with mean scores generally modest at long-term follow-up (reported in 13 studies). Return-to-sport rates, available from 8 studies, ranged from 60.4% to 85%. Osteoarthritis progression was reported in 7 studies, with the proportion of patients exhibiting Kellgren-Lawrence grades 3 or 4 at final follow-up ranging from 12% to 71.7%. Reoperation rates were reported in 7 studies and ranged from 1.7% to 34.3%, most commonly for manipulation under anesthesia and lysis of adhesions due to postoperative stiffness. Conversion to total knee arthroplasty was reported in 6 studies, with rates ranging from 0% to 10.9%. Repeat ligamentous surgery varied across 7 studies, with posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction failures most frequently reported. Conclusion: Outcomes >7 years after treatment of MLKIs demonstrate meaningful restoration of function and sport participation but remain tempered by significant rates of osteoarthritis and reoperation for stiffness. Advances in surgical technique and early rehabilitation have improved results in contemporary cohorts. Continued prospective evaluation using standardized protocols is essential to enhance joint preservation and patient quality of life. Registration: PROSPERO (CRD 420251078013).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.