ArticleJournal of Maine Medical Center2026
Best Practices in the Conduct of Community Engagement Studios at MaineHealth Institute for Research.
Article in Journal of Maine Medical Center, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Community-informed trial design and implementation to optimize recruitment and retention in low-income settings: lessons from rheumatic heart disease trials in Uganda.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Problem Statement: Community engagement (CE) Studios are an established method for integrating lived-experience expertise into research at 1 or more specific points within a project. Although many researchers understand the value of incorporating community input, they often lack the tools, skills, or infrastructure to do so effectively. CE Studios address this challenge by offering a structured, consultative approach to engagement. Background: CE Studios occur at any point across the research lifecycle and are used to inform research design, feasibility, relevance, recruitment, implementation, and translation. In a 1-time, 2-hour consultation, CE Studios bring lived-experience expertise into the research process, helping projects center patients' perspectives and inform research direction. Rooted in prior work by the Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, this model builds rapport with intended audiences and strengthens capacity for engagement among researchers and community members. Application: CE Studios require institutional support through the establishment of a neutral team trained in the model. At MaineHealth Institute for Research, a CE Studios team comprising community engagement and outreach navigators and staff was established in fall 2022. The CE Studio program is supported by the Northern New England Clinical and Translational Research Network infrastructure grant and nested within a larger community-engaged research effort. Since launch, the team has supported 14 CE Studios for 11 projects and collaborated with 5 institutions across Northern New England. This paper describes the implementation process at MaineHealth Institute for Research, as well as team roles, CE Studios structure, and lessons learned from launching and sustaining the model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.