ArticleInfection and drug resistance2026
Efficacy and Safety of Contezolid as Salvage Treatment for Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of contezolid from vancomycin or linezolid in cases of Gram-positive bacterial infections with insufficient clinical efficacy or adverse reactions. Methods: This was a retrospective, multicenter study. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they were treated with vancomycin or linezolid for a diagnosis of Gram-positive bacterial infection and were switched to least 3 doses of contezolid due to poor efficacy or adverse effects. Relevant clinical details were collected by medical record review. Results: A total of 191 patients from 34 hospitals in China were included. Based on clinical efficacy and microbiological clearance rate, the overall response rate of contezolid is 96.86%. Among patients switched to contezolid due to adverse reactions with linezolid or vancomycin, clinical improvement was observed in 121/131 (92.37%). Eight new adverse events occurred, six of which were related to contezolid (3.14%). Conclusion: In this observational study, switching from vancomycin or linezolid to contezolid in cases of inadequate clinical efficacy or adverse reactions was associated with favorable clinical outcomes and demonstrated promising effectiveness in a real-world setting. Causality cannot be inferred from these data. Contezolid may represent a therapeutic option for patients intolerant to or failing initial therapy, though prospective controlled studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.