ArticleCureus2026
Antipsychotic Medication Adherence Among Outpatients Attending the Centre Neuro Psycho Pathologique in Kinshasa: A Cross-Sectional Pilot Study of Treatment Attitudes, Insight, and Side-Effect Burden.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective Incomplete adherence to antipsychotics commonly undermines relapse prevention and functional stabilization in severe mental disorders. Published data from the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) are scarce. The objective of this pilot study was to estimate antipsychotic medication adherence among outpatients attending the Centre Neuro Psycho Pathologique (CNPP) in Kinshasa, DRC, and examine associations with treatment attitude, insight, and adverse effects using brief standardized instruments. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional pilot study from April to May 2025 at the outpatient service of the CNPP in Kinshasa, DRC. Adult patients (≥18 years) who had been prescribed at least one antipsychotic for a minimum duration of five weeks were included. Adherence was measured with the 10-item Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS). Adherence was dichotomized as good adherence (MARS ≥ 7) and poor adherence (MARS < 7). The Drug Attitude Inventory (DAI) was used to assess treatment attitude. Insight was assessed with the 8-item Birchwood Insight Scale (BIS-8). The Glasgow Antipsychotic Side-Effect Scale (GASS) measured the adverse effects of antipsychotics. Correlations between scales were examined by Spearman's rank correlation coefficient rho (ρ). Modelled associations were examined using logistic regression (exploratory, parsimonious models). Associations were explored using logistic regression. Significance was set at α = 0.05 with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results A total of 62 outpatients were included: mean age 37.5 years, standard deviation (SD) 14.4; 37 (59.7%) were men. Poor adherence occurred in 28 patients (45.2%; 95% CI 33.4-57.5). Mean scores were 5.89 (SD 3.04) for MARS, 2.52 (SD 5.37) for DAI, 5.80 (SD 2.86) for BIS, and 20.63 (SD 20.84) for GASS. Of the enrolled patients, 39 (62.9%) had a positive treatment attitude, nine (14.5%) had good insight, and 12 (19.4%) had a severe side-effect burden. The MARS correlated with DAI (ρ=0.787; p<0.001) and BIS-8 (ρ=0.616; p<0.001) and inversely with GASS (ρ=-0.660; p<0.001). In the multivariable extended model, higher DAI (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.54 per 1-point increase; 95% CI 0.32-0.93; p=0.025) and higher BIS-8 (aOR 0.39 per 1-point increase; 95% CI 0.17-0.87; p=0.022) were independently associated with lower odds of poor adherence; GASS was not independently associated (aOR 1.30; 95% CI 0.96-1.78; p=0.092). Conclusion Nearly half of the outpatients receiving antipsychotics in this Kinshasa pilot study reported poor adherence. Treatment attitude and insight, both modifiable, showed independent associations with poor adherence, while adverse effects were strongly correlated with adherence but were not independently associated after adjustment. These exploratory findings suggest that structured side-effect monitoring and shared decision-making may be relevant components to evaluate in future adherence-oriented interventions in constrained settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.