Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41908534›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2026

Community-based Kangaroo Mother Care in low-birth-weight infants: a quality improvement study in the urban slums of Kolkata, West Bengal.

Sweta Halder, Tila Khan, Naresh Kumar Gupta, Rumeli Das, Sreeparna Ghosh Mukherjee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sweta HalderHealth & Nutrition,Child in Need Institute (CINI), Pailan, West Bengal, India.
Tila KhanHealth & Nutrition,Child in Need Institute (CINI), Pailan, West Bengal, India.
Naresh Kumar GuptaHealth & Nutrition,Child in Need Institute (CINI), Pailan, West Bengal, India.
Rumeli DasHealth & Nutrition,Child in Need Institute (CINI), Pailan, West Bengal, India.
Sreeparna Ghosh MukherjeeHealth & Nutrition,Child in Need Institute (CINI), Pailan, West Bengal, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Kangaroo Mother Care (KMC) is recommended for low-birth-weight (LBW) infants in both facility and community, yet in India, KMC is largely confined to healthcare facilities. Evidence on the feasibility of implementing community-based KMC (c-KMC) in urban slum settings is limited. This quality improvement exploratory study explored the feasibility, safety, and adherence of implementing c-KMC in the urban slums of Kolkata, India. Methods: A preliminary qualitative assessment explored barriers to c-KMC through in-depth interviews with mothers of LBW infants ( Results: Mothers had limited KMC knowledge and received minimal counselling, or follow-up post-discharge. Frontline health workers cited workload, population density, migration, and space constraints as major barriers to c-KMC. Among 218 infants enrolled, only 23.4% received facility-initiated KMC. Average KMC duration was 3.4 h/day at homes across follow-up visits. By day 28, 95% of mothers continued KMC, no KMC related adverse event was noted and 84% practiced exclusive breastfeeding. Conclusion: c-KMC implementation was feasible and safe in slum settings when supported through structured counselling, home visits, and trained workers. The findings support the operational feasibility of integrating c-KMC within existing home-based newborn care platforms.

Indexed as

breastfeedingcommunity initiated carefeasibilityinfantkangaroo mother care methodlow birth weightneonate

Identifiers

PMID41908534
PMCPMC13017814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.