Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41908493›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026

Adaptation of visual responses in degenerating

Archana Jalligampala, Hamed Shabani, Eberhart Zrenner, Daniel L Rathbun, Zohreh Hosseinzadeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Archana JalligampalaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States.
Hamed ShabaniTheoretical Systems Neuroscience, Bernstein Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Eberhart ZrennerInstitute for Ophthalmic Research, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany.
Daniel L RathbunDepartment of Ophthalmology, Detroit Institute of Ophthalmology, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, United States.
Zohreh HosseinzadehDepartment of Ophthalmology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, GA, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Visual adaptation is a physiological and perceptual process by which the visual system adjusts to changes in the environment or visual stimuli. This process is fundamental to how we perceive the world around us and allows our visual system to efficiently encode and process visual information. The retina incorporates adaptation within its dozens of functionally distinct retinal ganglion cell types. Meanwhile, the field of retinal prostheses is increasing its understanding of electrical adaptation and cell-specific stimulation. However, very little is known about the interaction of visual and electrical stimulation on the adaptation of retinal ganglion cell types. Methods/Approach: Recording with a microelectrode array (MEA), we presented an ON and OFF full-field, visual stimulus to characterize various visual response parameters in healthy and degenerating Main results: A history of electrical stimulation strengthened visual responses in WT retina, even when changes attributable to Significance: Electrical stimulation-induced changes in the retina should be considered in the encoding of visual stimuli by retinal prosthetic devices.

Indexed as

durationelectrical stimulationlatencyMEAON/OFF indexresponse changes

Identifiers

PMID41908493
PMCPMC13022506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.