ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026
The effects of mirror visual feedback involved network priming on embodiment perception in healthy subjects: a proof-of-concept study.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Mirror visual feedback (MVF) efficacy varies with individual embodiment perception. Objective: The study aimed to investigate the behavioral effects of priming via the rubber hand illusion (RHI) and action observation (AO) on embodiment perception during MVF. Methods: Twenty healthy participants were recruited. This experiment contained three rounds: MVF, RHI-MVF, and AO-MVF. At first, all the participants completed the round of MVF, and after 24 hours, they received the round of RHI-MVF or AO-MVF at a random order with an interval of 24 hours. Each round comprised two sessions, including session of simple motor tasks (SMT) and session of objective-based tasks (OBT). In addition, each session contained 5 tasks, which was repeated 10 times at a frequency of 2 seconds per time. Results: The results showed that priming of networks overlapping with MVF through RHI/AO paradigms could enhance the intensity of embodiment perception. The machine learning analysis further revealed a stronger predictive association between RHI and heightened embodiment perception compared to AO. Additionally, we found that OBT could facilitate embodiment elicitation, comparing to SMT. Conclusion: Our findings provided, which insights into modulating embodiment perception during MVF paradigms. These preliminary results might benefit future investigations therapeutic efficacy in neuro-rehabilitation. Clinical trial registration: Identifier ChiCTR2500102438.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.