Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41908487›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026

Adaptive and lightweight surrogate gradients: enhancing training efficiency of spiking neural networks.

Kungjui Hou, Kunlun Wu, Yongcheng Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kungjui Hou *Lingyange Semiconductor Inc., Zhuhai, Guangdong, China.
Kunlun Wu *School of Artificial Intelligence, Anhui University, Hefei, China.
Yongcheng ZhouSchool of Automation, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) have emerged as a promising paradigm in artificial intelligence due to their energy efficiency. However, training SNNs remains a formidable challenge because the nondifferentiable nature of spike activation functions prevents the direct application of conventional backpropagation. Existing surrogate gradient methods often suffer from critical limitations, including gradient mismatch, gradient explosion or vanishing, and high computational overhead. Methods: In this paper, we propose an Adaptive and Lightweight (AdaLi) backpropagation method to address these issues. AdaLi reduces the computational complexity of the training process by introducing lightweight surrogate gradients and dynamically adjusting gradient update boundaries. Furthermore, it employs an adaptive mechanism to adjust the surrogate gradients based on training epochs, thereby enhancing network stability. The method also provides additional hyperparameters to address gradient mismatch, which can be either manually fine-tuned or automatically determined based on the distribution of spiking neuron membrane potentials. Results: Experimental results on both static and neuromorphic datasets demonstrate that SNNs trained with AdaLi outperform their baseline counterparts in terms of efficiency and accuracy. The stable surrogate gradients in AdaLi effectively mitigate the issues of gradient vanishing and explosion. Conclusion: The AdaLi method introduces a novel approach to optimizing gradient calculation and parameter updates in SNNs, paving the way for more effective and accurate training. The source code is available at https://github.com/parania/AdaLi.

Indexed as

adaptive traininglightweight backpropagationspiking neural networkssurrogate gradienttraining efficiency

Identifiers

PMID41908487
PMCPMC13021602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.