ArticleACS omega2026
Preparation and Process Optimization of Hot-Pressed Straw-Sulfate Magnesium Cement Composite Panels.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Magnesium oxysulfide cement, due to its unique composition, is lightweight and highly fire-resistant. As a new type of inorganic cementitious material, it has considerable application potential in the production of artificial boards. Using wheat straw as the raw material and magnesium oxysulfide cement as the adhesive, straw-magnesium oxysulfide cement artificial boards were prepared through uniform laying and hot pressing. The mechanical properties and water absorption expansion rate of the artificial boards were evaluated. The optimal process parameters were identified through orthogonal experiments. The results indicate that under the optimal conditions (12 min, 120 °C, 7.5 MPa), the manufactured board achieved peak performance. The static bending strength was 6.09 MPa, the elastic modulus was 764 MPa, and the internal bonding strength was 2.21 MPa. Additionally, the 2 h water absorption thickness expansion rate was 242.6%.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.