Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41908300›Full record

ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2026

Radiograph-Based Evaluation of Uncemented Humeral Hemiarthroplasty.

John M Ibrahim, Sophie S Darwiche, Jefferson Li, Michael J Niemann, Mark E Baratz, Robert A Kaufmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Reproducing Valgus Angle in Uncemented Humeral Hemiarthroplasty.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

John M IbrahimDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Sophie S DarwicheDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Presbyterian University Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA.
Jefferson LiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Michael J NiemannDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Mark E BaratzDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Robert A KaufmannDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study identifies whether a novel hemiarthroplasty implant that achieves fixation with an intramedullary screw accurately restores native anatomy based on radiographic parameters. Methods: Six cadaveric specimens were stripped of soft tissue. A novel hemiarthroplasty with modular components was implanted into each cadaver. Radiographic measurements were taken to compare pre- and postimplantation anatomy. Results: The average age of the cadavers was 62.7 years. The trochlear width of the implant averaged 3.39 mm (range, 2.37-4.7 mm) smaller than the native trochlear width. The implant capitellum center averaged 5.28 mm (range, 3.92-7.29 mm) away from the native capitellum center on the anteroposterior (AP) view and 3.74 mm (range, 1.13-6.57 mm) on the lateral view. The distance between the humeral centerline and the center of the implanted trochlea averaged 0.5 mm (0.15-0.95 mm) from the native distance. The offset between the centerline of rotation in the native humerus and in the implant averaged 0.35 mm (range, 0.08-0.87 mm) on the AP view. The angle between the intramedullary (IM) canal of the native elbow and the IM screw was, on average, 0.67° (range, 0.14-2.30°) on the AP view and 1.45° (range, 0.52-2.57°) on the lateral view. The angle between the IM screw and the component body was, on average, 1.95° (range, 0.94-3.0°) on the AP view and 2.21° (range, 0.97-5.55°) on the lateral view. Conclusions: Native anatomy can be matched when implanting a distal humerus hemiarthroplasty that employs modular, intramedullary fixation. Angular laxity between the body component and IM screw accommodates variable patient anatomy of the distal humerus. Clinical relevance: These results suggest that uncemented hemiarthroplasty can reproduce anatomy based on radiographic parameters.

Indexed as

Distal humerus fractureElbow arthritisElbow hemiarthroplastyIntramedullary screwUncemented hemiarthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID41908300
PMCPMC13022624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.