Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41908290›Full record

ArticleMedEdPublish (2016)2026

A Qualitative Study of a New Generation of Irish-Trained Doctors' Views on Selection for Medicine.

Seán Barber, Deirdre Bennett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MedEdPublish (2016), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Seán BarberUniversity College Cork School of Medicine, Cork, County Cork, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5555-6430
Deirdre BennettUniversity College Cork School of Medicine, Cork, County Cork, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Student selection for Medicine degree programmes is a complex and high-stakes process. In Ireland, students entering from secondary school are selected based on combined scores achieved in the state school exit examination (Leaving Certificate) and the Health Professions Aptitude Test (HPAT-Ireland), introduced in 2009 to broaden entry assessment beyond academic achievement alone. Questions remain about the validity, fairness, and alignment with the skills required for medical practice of this approach. This study explored the views of the "HPAT generation" (doctors admitted via HPAT-Ireland) on ideals and processes of medical student selection, including the relevance and equity of the Irish system. Methods: An interpretivist qualitative study using semi-structured interviews was conducted and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results: Twelve Irish-trained doctors admitted post-2009 were interviewed. Four themes were identified. Participants identified Conclusions: Findings highlight tensions between academic thresholds, authentic assessment of differentiators, and equitable access. Doctors of the HPAT-Ireland generation support a two-stage selection system but are sceptical of HPAT-Ireland's ability to fulfil its intended role. Policy reforms must address these tensions to ensure fair and sustainable medical student selection.

Indexed as

aptitude testingassessment validityequity and accessHPAT-IrelandMedical student selectionqualitative researchstakeholder opinionsthematic analysis

Identifiers

PMID41908290
PMCPMC13022560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.