ArticleFrontiers in neurology
Real-world outcomes after switching from standard therapy to efgartigimod in five patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: a case series study in Japan.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Efgartigimod, a neonatal Fc receptor blocker, has received regulatory approval for the treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) in Japan in December 2024. Aims: To investigate the effectiveness and safety of efgartigimod in real-world clinical setting immediately after its approval. Methods: We conducted a prospective, single-center, case series study to evaluate the switch from standard therapy to efgartigimod in five patients with typical or variant CIDP in Japan. Effectiveness was assessed with clinical responses defined by changes in the Inflammatory Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale, Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment, Medical Research Council sum scores, and grip strength. The occurrence of adverse events (AEs) was also monitored. Results: Three patients had typical CIDP, one had variant CIDP of the motor type, and one had distal type CIDP. All patients exhibited a clinical response evaluated using at least one effectiveness endpoint after switching to efgartigimod treatment. Especially, the three patients with typical CIDP experienced an significant effectiveness of efgartigimod, even in those with an inadequate response to intravenous or subcutaneous immunoglobulin. Conversely, one patient with distal CIDP did not exhibit a response to efgartigimod treatment. One patient experienced a severe headache after efgartigimod treatment; however, the AE was manageable. Conclusion: Efgartigimod is a useful treatment option for CIDP in real-world clinical practice. However, its effectiveness was different between the patients with typical CIDP and CIDP variant in our study, possibly due to variances in the immune pathophysiology of each disease subtype. Further validation is warranted in our exploratory findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.