ArticleFrontiers in neurology
Cerebrovascular diagnosis using CTA-based intracranial aneurysm classification via transfer learning and Grad-CAM visualization.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence for Cerebral Aneurysm Management: Integrating Imaging, Hemodynamics, and Clinical Decision Support.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Intracranial aneurysm (IA) is a focal cerebral artery dilatation affecting 2-5% of the population, with rupture leading to high mortality and disability. Early, accurate classification from computed tomography angiography (CTA) is crucial for management but is challenged by small datasets and limited interpretability. We evaluate a hybrid deep transfer learning framework with integrated Grad-CAM to improve both discrimination and explainability in CTA-based IA classification. Methods: In this retrospective study, 83 eligible patients from two centers underwent CTA. We employed stratified 5-fold cross-validation to compare: a baseline deep learning model (DL), a transfer learning-enhanced model (DL + TL), and radiologist assessment. Both AI models used a hybrid ResNet-18 architecture with LASSO feature selection and logistic regression. Performance was assessed using AUC, accuracy, calibration, decision curve analysis, NRI, and IDI. Interpretability was quantified via Grad-CAM using Intersection-over-Union (IoU) and Dice similarity coefficient. Results: The DL + TL model achieved superior performance with a mean AUC of 0.853 (95% CI: 0.789-0.912) and accuracy of 84.0%, outperforming both DL (AUC: 0.744, Conclusion: Integrating transfer learning with quantitative interpretability assessment improves both accuracy and transparency of IA classification in limited-data settings. This framework offers a validated, interpretable approach for neurovascular imaging, pending further multi-center validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.