ArticleFrontiers in neurology
Integrated assessment of contrast-enhanced TCD and TTE for noninvasive detection of patent foramen ovale under resting and Valsalva conditions.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To compare the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced transcranial Doppler (c-TCD) and contrast-enhanced transthoracic echocardiography (c-TTE) under resting and Valsalva conditions for detecting patent foramen ovale (PFO), and to evaluate the clinical utility of an integrated diagnostic model combining both modalities. Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, a total of 146 patients with suspected PFO underwent both c-TCD and c-TTE at rest and during the Valsalva maneuver. Among them, 40 patients also received contrast-enhanced transesophageal echocardiography (c-TEE), which served as the reference standard. Detection rates, shunt grading, and inter-modality agreement were analyzed. A logistic regression model integrating c-TCD and c-TTE findings was developed and assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: The Valsalva maneuver significantly increased the detection rates of right-to-left shunt (c-TCD: from 41.4% to 76.7%; c-TTE: from 45.2% to 80.1%) and the proportion of Grade 3 shunts ( Conclusion: Valsalva maneuver significantly enhances the diagnostic yield of both c-TCD and c-TTE. While c-TCD may serve as an effective first-line screening tool, its combination with c-TTE ensures improved diagnostic accuracy and clinical decision-making value. The integrated model demonstrates strong potential for clinical implementation as a noninvasive, efficient strategy to reduce unnecessary c-TEE procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.