ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia2026
Economic burden of typhoid fever by antimicrobial resistance in India: a modelling study 2023.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Typhoid fever and rising antimicrobial resistance contribute towards substantial morbidity in India. Introduction of typhoid conjugate vaccine in national immunisation schedule is under consideration to address this growing disease burden. In this study we estimated the economic burden of typhoid fever for 2023, disaggregated by age, provincial states of India, and fluoroquinolone resistance, from societal and government perspectives, to support national vaccination policy. Methods: We developed a decision-tree model using Indian empirical data on typhoid epidemiology, care-seeking, clinical outcomes, and estimated direct and indirect costs for hospitalised and non-hospitalised typhoid fever patients. To reflect age-specific uncertainty in hospitalisation patterns and resulting economic burden, we used two primary scenarios. We estimated productivity losses due to premature mortality using the human capital approach, with the friction-cost approach as an alternative. We assessed uncertainty through probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Findings: The economic burden of typhoid fever in India in 2023 was estimated at INR 123.0 billion (95% UI 76.7-215.5; US$ 1.5 billion, 0.9-2.6), including a cost of INR 13.0 billion (6.6-27.0; US$ 157 million, 80-326) to the public health system (government perspective). Fluoroquinolone-resistant infections accounted for 87% of total costs. Children under ten years of age incurred the highest economic burden, contributing over half of the total costs. Households bore 91% of expenses, and 70,000 families faced catastrophic health expenditure. Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh (including Telangana), Tamil Nadu, and West Bengal were the states estimated to account for 51% of the national costs. Productivity loss was INR 42.6 billion (15.7-111.1; US$ 515 million) based on the human capital approach and declined by 99.8% under the friction-cost approach. Interpretation: Typhoid fever imposes a significant economic burden in India, shaped by fluoroquinolone resistance, children less than ten years of age, and high-burden provincial states of the country, resulting in considerable household financial strain. Our findings provide key evidence to support the introduction of the typhoid conjugate vaccine, enhance antimicrobial resistance control, and guide national health financing policies. Funding: WISE programme; International Vaccine Institute; Vaccine Impact Modelling Consortium; Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.