ReviewProstate international2026
Irreversible electroporation for partial gland ablation: clinical application and outcomes.
Review in Prostate international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most commonly diagnosed malignancy in men. Radical treatments such as radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy can be associated with morbidity that impact quality of life. Focal therapy has emerged as a promising alternative to radical whole-gland treatment, with irreversible electroporation (IRE) being a novel nonthermal ablation technique. IRE involves the application of high-voltage, short-duration electrical pulses to induce apoptosis while preserving critical structures such as nerves and blood vessels. This targeted approach aims to minimize adverse effects associated with radical treatments while maintaining oncological efficacy. Despite promising early outcomes, international guidelines have not yet fully endorsed IRE for PCa due to a lack of long-term randomized data. Current evidence suggests that IRE is most suitable for localized low- to intermediate-risk PCa, offering a middle ground between active surveillance and radical treatment. Additionally, salvage IRE has demonstrated potential in managing radio-recurrent PCa, with studies such as the Irreversible Electroporation (IRE) for Prostate Tumour Tissue in patients with Prostate Cancer (FIRE) and SAlvage Focal Irreversible Electroporation-For Recurrent Localized Prostate Cancer (SAFE) trials reporting favorable oncological and functional outcomes. Imaging plays a crucial role in patient selection and treatment planning, with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography being essential for disease localization. While prostate biopsy remains the gold standard for histological confirmation, the utility of tissue, urine, and serum biomarkers in focal therapy is still under investigation. Follow-up protocols for IRE are evolving, with consensus guidelines recommending prostate biopsy at one year, Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) monitoring, and serial multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. Functional outcomes, including urinary and erectile function, require long-term assessment. While current studies suggest that IRE achieves high rates of local cancer control, out-of-field recurrence remains a concern. Further prospective trials are necessary to establish its role in the definitive management of PCa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.