ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2026
Core neuromuscular co-activation mechanisms partly explain trunk kinematics in a perturbed postural task.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: When facing a ground translation, trunk neuromuscular control remains unclear, despite its importance in sport practice, because core neuromuscular co-activations have not been investigated. Indeed, the spinal stiffness and trunk kinematics are impacted by core co-activation in dynamic tasks. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine whether core neuromuscular co-activations could explain its motion during perturbed postural tasks. Methods: Thirty-six athletes (handball, karate, long jump) performed a perturbed postural task, facing six medial ground translations in unipedal stance. Trunk and hip kinematics were recorded with inertial measurement units and rectus abdominis, external obliques and erector spinal were measured with surface electromyography (EMG). Trunk and hip joint angles, as well as directed co-activation ratio and co-activation index between left and right EMG signals, were computed from 100 ms prior to the start of the translation until 800 ms after. Moreover, core neuromuscular latencies and trunk amplitude were calculated. Results: Core muscles co-activation ratios varied according to trunk kinematics during the perturbation. Furthermore, earlier activation for agonists' muscles combined with larger activation compared to antagonists' muscles in the early phase of the perturbation were noticed ( Conclusions: Overall, our results supported the active role of the core to maintain postural balance and underlined that the neuromuscular co-activation analysis is useful to provide a better understanding of core control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.