ArticleAcademic pathology
Cultivating competence in error management: The development and impact of a tailored quality improvement and patient safety curriculum in pathology training.
Article in Academic pathology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite recent efforts in medicine to minimize diagnostic errors in healthcare, a gap persists in the formal education of pathology trainees in quality improvement and patient safety and error management. This study evaluates a formal curriculum developed and implemented over one year at a pathology residency training program aimed at addressing this educational gap for pathology trainees. A year-long curriculum was developed and implemented involving didactics, small group discussions, and case-based exercises known as error management cases of the week. Pre- and post-curricular surveys assessed trainees' attitudes, beliefs, skills, and confidence related to quality improvement and patient safety. The curriculum's success was measured via participation rates, changes in trainees' attitudes, beliefs, skills, and confidence related to quality improvement and patient safety as measured through surveys, and longitudinal comparisons with national resident survey results. The pre-survey revealed a pressing need for quality improvement and patient safety training, especially among early trainees. Postcurriculum, trainee participants demonstrated significant improvement in confidence and application of quality improvement and patient safety methodologies. This was further supported by an increase in the pathology trainees' participation in safety event investigations compared to averages from a national survey. The study highlights the effectiveness of a structured quality improvement and patient safety curriculum in enhancing trainee competence and confidence, suggesting a template for wider adoption in pathology residencies. The curriculum's success in shifting attitudes and skills advocates for its integration into national residency programs, promoting a culture of safety and open error management in the field of pathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.