Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41908123›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026

The effectiveness of specialist cognitive behavioural therapy for functional neurological disorder: a service evaluation.

Rhiannon White, Susannah Pick, Trudie Chalder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rhiannon WhiteDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Susannah PickDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Trudie ChalderDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Functional neurological disorder (FND) is a common and disabling condition associated with high levels of functional impairment and psychological distress. Psychological therapies such as cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) are increasingly recommended as part of multidisciplinary care, but evidence from real-world clinical settings remains limited. Methods: This retrospective observational cohort study evaluated outcomes from a specialist CBT programme for adults with FND using routinely collected clinical data. Self-report measures of depression, anxiety, psychological distress, functional impairment, physical functioning, pain, and six cognitive-behavioural responses were collected before, during, and at the end of treatment. Linear mixed-effects models were used to examine change over time, with correction for multiple testing. Results: Data from 234 patients were analyzed (70.5% female; mean age 40.9 years). Despite low completion of measures at follow up, significant improvements were observed in psychological distress, functional impairment, and five of the six cognitive-behavioural response domains across treatment, whereas no significant change was seen in physical functioning or pain measures. Sensitivity analyses excluding patients who received three or fewer sessions produced a consistent pattern of results. Conclusions: These findings suggest that specialist CBT for FND delivered in routine clinical practice is associated with meaningful improvements in distress, functioning, and key cognitive-behavioural maintenance processes, supporting its role within multidisciplinary care.

Indexed as

cognitive-behavioural approachfunctional symptomspsychological distresspsychological therapiesroutine clinical practice

Identifiers

PMID41908123
PMCPMC13021667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.