ArticleAdvances in rehabilitation science and practice
Rehabilitation Service Delivery Models to Foster Healthy Ageing in the WHO European Region: Results From a Cross-Sectional Stakeholder Consultation Involving 45 Countries.
Article in Advances in rehabilitation science and practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: As populations age, rehabilitation needs are increasing sharply. Older people experience declining intrinsic capacity, multimorbidity, and environmental barriers, which intensify their reliance on rehabilitation to optimize and maintain functional ability. Despite its critical role in healthy ageing, access to rehabilitation remains limited across the WHO European Region (WHO EURO). Aim: To examine the availability, implementation, and challenges of rehabilitation service delivery for older people in WHO EURO from the perspectives of rehabilitation stakeholders. Design and Methods: We conducted a secondary mixed-methods analysis of a 2023/2024 global online survey called "Rehabilitation Service Delivery to Foster Healthy Ageing," initially designed to identify and validate global rehabilitation delivery models, focusing on WHO EURO data. The survey, offered in 8 languages, targeted health and care workers providing rehabilitation for people aged 60 and above. Quantitative and qualitative data were analysed descriptively, thematically, and integrated using the Health System Dynamics Framework. Reporting followed CROSS and MMR-RHS guidelines. Results: 706 responses from 45 countries were analysed. Six validated rehabilitation delivery models were confirmed: outpatient, inpatient, home, telerehabilitation, community, and residential long-term care. Findings revealed disparities in the availability of these models and in the responsiveness - assessed through a self-designed responsiveness index - of rehabilitation services to ageing populations, varying by country and income level. Strengthening outpatient, home, and residential long-term rehabilitation was considered most urgently needed. Barriers and facilitators to strengthening rehabilitation were identified across all domains of the Health System Dynamics Framework and synthesized into 8 themes and 19 subthemes. Discussion: Rehabilitation models remain unevenly implemented across Europe, and inequities in provision persist. Systemic barriers span governance, financing, human resources, and service delivery, underlining the importance of integrated approaches that reflect older people's realities and priorities. Conclusion: Rehabilitation plays a key role not only after illness or injury but also in maintaining functional ability during age-related declines in intrinsic capacity. Strengthening rehabilitation for older people is essential for Healthy Ageing and requires investment, intersectoral collaboration, and implementation science to overcome systemic barriers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.