ArticleRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health2026
Building national health research agendas and defining research questions.
Article in Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past two decades, countries in Latin America and the Caribbean have made substantial progress in strengthening research systems, in which the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) Policy on Research for Health has been instrumental. Research agendas have emerged as a key mechanism to bridge national policy priorities with the production of relevant and timely evidence that is aligned with national health priorities. This paper explores the strategic role of health research agendas in aligning evidence generation with decision-making needs. Drawing on recent exercises conducted in the region, including a regional health research agenda for the Oropouche virus and the Costa Rican Social Security System (CCSS) research agenda, the paper highlights both the progress and persistent challenges in this process. A core contribution of these two examples is the introduction of the Matching Q-M tool, a decision-support resource that helps translate policy-relevant topics into well-formulated research questions and match them with appropriate methodological approaches to address them. By enhancing communication between policymakers and researchers, the potential for research agendas to inform relevant, feasible, and demand-driven studies can help to institutionalize and consolidate the role of research as a strategic lever for health equity and system improvement. In a region where the research community has made long-standing contributions, national research agendas can serve as a foundational element of more resilient, responsive, and evidence-informed health systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.