Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41908039›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026

A novel therapy for eliminating phrenic nerve stimulation: a long-term follow-up case report.

Jia Li, Hongwei Yi, Hongwei Han, Hua Yan

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jia LiDepartment of Cardiology, Wuhan Asian Heart Hospital, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Hongwei YiDepartment of Cardiology, Wuhan Asian Heart Hospital, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Hongwei HanDepartment of Cardiology, Wuhan Asian Heart Hospital, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Hua YanDepartment of Cardiology, Wuhan Asian Heart Hospital, Wuhan, Hubei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) is a frequent occurrence in patients implanted with a cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device. Most PNS can be eliminated by external programming of pacing threshold, pacing polarity, etc., but there are still a small number of refractory PNS cases that need electrode reset. The latter has many uncertainties, such as poor coronary sinus (CS) target vessel conditions, venous pathway obstruction or occlusion, recurrence of PNS, pacemaker sac infection, disappearance of CRT super response, etc. In view of this, we reported one case of PNS after CRT treated by isolating the left phrenic nerve (PN) and the left ventricular (LV) electrode.

Indexed as

cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)coronary sinus (CS)heart failure (HF)left ventricular (LV)phrenic nerve (PN)phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS)

Identifiers

PMID41908039
PMCPMC13021445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.